Business Formation Archives - Petersen

Does California Require an Operating Agreement?

Yes — but with an important caveat. California Corporations Code Section 17701.10 requires that an LLC have an operating agreement. However, the statute does not require the agreement to be in writing, and it does not specify any particular provisions that must be included.

In practice, this means a California LLC can technically operate under an undocumented or minimally documented agreement — and many do. The consequence is that when a dispute arises or a transaction occurs, the default rules under the California Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (RULLCA) fill the gaps. Those defaults are often not what the members would have chosen if they had thought it through. For any multi-member LLC, or any company that may one day be acquired or take on investors, a written operating agreement is not optional as a practical matter.

Key Provisions Every California LLC Operating Agreement Should Include

A well-drafted operating agreement addresses, at minimum:

Membership interests and capital accounts — who owns what percentage, what each member contributed, and how capital accounts are maintained

Voting and decision-making — which decisions require unanimous consent versus majority, and how voting power is allocated

Management structure — member-managed versus manager-managed, scope of manager authority, and conditions for removal or replacement

Distributions — when and how distributions are made, whether discretionary or mandatory, and how tax distributions are handled

Transfer restrictions — whether members can freely transfer interests, what approval is required, and rights of first refusal

Admission of new members — the process and whether unanimous consent is required

Buyout mechanics — what happens when a member exits, dies, divorces, or becomes incapacitated, and how the buyout price is determined

Dissolution triggers — what events cause the LLC to wind down and how assets are distributed

Common Mistakes

Using a generic online template. Templates frequently omit California-specific requirements and fail to address the actual dynamics of your ownership group. A template designed for a two-person tech startup may be wholly inadequate for a professional services firm or a property management company.

No transfer restrictions. Without clear restrictions, an unwanted third party — a creditor, ex-spouse, or bankruptcy trustee — may acquire a membership interest. California’s charging order protection is valuable, but it works best in conjunction with well-drafted transfer restrictions in the agreement itself. Note that California’s restrictive non-compete rules limit how restrictive certain departing-member covenants can be, so they have to be drafted carefully.

Vague buyout pricing. Provisions calling for buyout at “fair market value” without specifying a valuation methodology or arbitration mechanism invite expensive disputes. Specify the process, name a default appraiser, or build in a shotgun provision if the members are comfortable with that structure.

No tax distribution provision. Members of a pass-through LLC may face tax liability on allocated income without having received cash to pay it. This is a straightforward fix that is consistently omitted from generic templates.

Failing to update. An operating agreement drafted at formation may be wholly inadequate after a new partner joins, outside capital comes in, or the business materially changes. Operating agreements should be reviewed and updated when circumstances change. If you’re still at the start of the process, our legal checklist for starting a business in California walks through the full sequence of formation steps.

A Note on M&A Transactions

If your LLC is ever acquired — whether through a purchase of membership interests or an asset purchase — the operating agreement is one of the first documents a buyer’s counsel reviews. Gaps, inconsistencies, and unresolved governance issues delay transactions, reduce negotiating leverage, and create indemnification exposure. Well-drafted operating agreements facilitate clean deals; poorly drafted ones create friction at the worst possible time. For business owners considering a future sale, our overview of the sell-side M&A process shows where governance documents come under scrutiny.

Choosing your business entity is one of the most important decisions you’ll make. It affects your taxes, liability protection, ability to raise capital, and future flexibility. But making the right choice can be difficult. Read our guide to learn everything you need to know to ensure you are choosing the right business entity.

Choosing the Right Business Entity: C Corp, S Corp, or LLC?

When it comes to making the right choice about your business structure, you are likely going to be selecting between three types: a C Corp, an S Corp, and an LLC. Here is what to know about each to ensure you are choosing the right business entity.

C Corporation – Ideal for businesses seeking venture capital or planning to go public

C Corporations offer unlimited growth potential by allowing multiple classes of stock and an unlimited number of shareholders, making them the preferred choice for venture capitalists and institutional investors.

Founders and early investors may also qualify for Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS) benefits, potentially excluding up to $15 million in capital gains from taxation.

C-Corps provide strong liability protection and can own other C-Corps, S-Corps, and LLCs, though owning an S-Corp terminates that entity’s S election. But C-Corps face double taxation, profits are taxed at the corporate level and again when distributed to shareholders as dividends.

They also require complex compliance, including board meetings, annual reports, and formal procedures, making them the most expensive entity type to maintain.

S Corporation – Ideal for profitable service businesses and small companies distributing profits to owners

S Corporations provide pass-through taxation, meaning income flows directly to shareholders without corporate-level tax, avoiding the double taxation of C-Corps.

The major advantage is self-employment tax savings: shareholders pay themselves a reasonable salary (subject to 15.3% self-employment tax) but can take additional profits as distributions that aren’t subject to this tax.

S-Corp shareholders also benefit from the 20% Qualified Business Income deduction.

The tradeoffs are significant. S-Corps are limited to 100 shareholders who must be U.S. citizens or residents, and only one class of stock is permitted. Distributions must be made in exact proportion to ownership percentages, eliminating flexibility in compensation arrangements.

Most importantly, S-Corps face severe ownership restrictions: they cannot be owned by C-Corps, partnerships, multi-member LLCs, or other S-Corps.

If an ineligible entity acquires S-Corp stock, the S election terminates automatically, potentially creating adverse tax consequences. This makes S-Corps unsuitable as holding companies in most multi-entity structures. The IRS also closely scrutinizes S-Corps to ensure compliance with reasonable compensation requirements.

Limited Liability Company (LLC) – Ideal for maximum flexibility and simple operations

LLCs are a legal structure, not a tax classification. This is the critical distinction.

By default, single-member LLCs are taxed as disregarded entities (like sole proprietorships) and multi-member LLCs are taxed as partnerships. However, LLCs can elect to be taxed as S-Corps or C-Corps, providing unmatched flexibility to optimize tax treatment as your business evolves.

When taxed as partnerships, LLCs offer tremendous flexibility in profit allocations through their operating agreements, unlike S-Corps, which must distribute in exact proportion to ownership.

LLCs have minimal compliance requirements, no mandatory board meetings or annual reports, making them simpler and less expensive to maintain than corporations.

They provide the same liability protection as corporations and can be owned by anyone: individuals, C-Corps, S-Corps (if single-member), other LLCs, partnerships, trusts, or foreign entities. LLCs also work well as holding companies since they can own multiple entities without the ownership restrictions that plague S-Corps.

The primary disadvantage of LLCs taxed as disregarded entities or partnerships is that members generally pay self-employment tax on all business income, not just salary. This can result in significantly higher taxes than an S-Corp structure.

Additionally, venture capitalists and institutional investors typically prefer C-Corps over LLCs for significant capital raises or IPOs. However, LLCs can elect S-Corp taxation to gain self-employment tax advantages or C-Corp taxation if seeking institutional investment, providing a path to optimize as circumstances change.

Ownership Restrictions: What Can Own What?

Understanding ownership restrictions is critical for planning corporate structures and avoiding costly mistakes.

C Corporations can be owned by anyone and can own anything, though purchasing an S-Corp terminates that entity’s S election. S Corporations can only be owned by individuals who are U.S. citizens or residents, certain trusts, and estates, not by other corporations or multi-member LLCs.

If an ineligible shareholder acquires S-Corp stock, the S election automatically terminates. S-Corps can own C-Corps and single-member LLCs, but generally cannot own other S-Corps, making them impractical as holding companies.

LLCs can be owned by anyone and can own anything, providing maximum flexibility for holding company structures.

This matters significantly in practice. If you’re building a holding company structure to own multiple operating businesses, C-Corps and LLCs provide the necessary flexibility, while S-Corps cannot effectively serve this role.

Similarly, if you plan to be acquired by another business, a C-Corp parent acquiring your S-Corp terminates the S election immediately, potentially creating unexpected tax consequences.

C-Corp vs. LLC for Holding Companies: Which Should You Choose?

Both C-Corps and LLCs can serve as effective holding companies, but the choice depends on your specific circumstances:

Choose a C-Corp holding company when: You plan to retain significant earnings at the holding company level rather than distributing them to owners. The corporate tax rate may be advantageous for accumulating capital for future acquisitions or investments. You’re building a structure that will eventually go public or attract institutional investors who prefer corporate structures. You need to offer different classes of stock to investors or key employees. You want to take advantage of certain tax strategies available only to C-Corps, such as tax-free reorganizations under Section 368.
Choose an LLC holding company when: You want pass-through taxation to avoid double taxation on profits distributed to owners. The holding company will primarily pass through income from operating subsidiaries without accumulating substantial earnings. You need maximum flexibility in allocating profits and losses among owners disproportionate to ownership percentages. You want simpler compliance and lower administrative costs—no board meetings or corporate formalities required. Your ownership group includes entities or individuals that couldn’t own S-Corp stock, but you still want pass-through treatment. You’re building a real estate holding structure where depreciation and other tax attributes flow through more beneficially.
Hybrid Approach: Many sophisticated structures use both, for example, an LLC holding company that owns multiple C-Corp operating companies, or a C-Corp parent that owns LLC subsidiaries. The optimal structure depends on your specific tax situation, exit strategy, and operational needs. This is where experienced legal and tax counsel becomes invaluable.

Quick Decision Guide for Choosing the Right Business Entity

To make this choice even easier, we have simplified what you should consider when making this decision. Here is our quick decision guide for choosing the right business entity:

Choose C-Corp if:

Raising venture capital
Planning to go public
Need complex ownership structures with different stock classes
Building a holding company that will retain and reinvest earnings
Want access to C-Corp-only tax strategies

Choose S-Corp (or LLC electing S-Corp taxation) if:

Profitable and want to minimize self-employment taxes
Keeping ownership simple (under 100 U.S. shareholders)
Distributing profits regularly
Don’t need a holding company structure

Choose LLC (partnership/disregarded taxation) if:

Want maximum flexibility
Need creative profit-sharing arrangements
Starting out and want to elect S-Corp or C-Corp taxation later
Simple operations with minimal compliance burden
Building a holding company with pass-through taxation and flexible distributions
Real estate holding structures

So, what’s the bottom line? The stakes are high. This decision can mean hundreds of thousands in tax savings or costly restructuring down the road. Petersen + Landis PC helps entrepreneurs navigate entity selection by modeling tax outcomes across different structures, understanding ownership restrictions, electing optimal tax treatment for LLCs, designing holding company structures, and planning for future growth and acquisitions.

📧 [info@petersenlandis.com] | 📞 [858.925.7084] | 🌐 [www.petersenlandis.com]

Disclaimer: For informational purposes only. Not legal or tax advice. Consult qualified advisors for your specific situation.